Corporate governance plays a critical role in mergers and acquisitions (M&A), serving as the framework by which companies are directed and controlled throughout the transaction process. Effective governance ensures that both the acquiring company and the target company operate in the best interests of their shareholders while also adhering to regulatory standards. In this article, I’ll explore why corporate governance is essential in M&A transactions, discuss common governance challenges, and highlight how companies can navigate these complexities to achieve successful outcomes.
The Role of Corporate Governance in M&A
Corporate governance encompasses the rules, processes, and practices that ensure a company’s management acts in the best interest of shareholders and stakeholders. In the context of M&A, governance plays a crucial role in several key areas:
Protecting Shareholder Interests
One of the primary functions of corporate governance in M&A is to protect the interests of shareholders, particularly those of the target company. When a company is being acquired, shareholders expect that management and the board of directors will act in their best interests by securing a fair price for their shares and ensuring that the transaction terms are favorable. Governance mechanisms like independent board committees and shareholder votes are essential to safeguard these interests.
For example, in a friendly acquisition, the board of directors is responsible for evaluating the offer and negotiating the best possible terms for shareholders. In a hostile takeover, corporate governance plays an even more critical role, as the board may need to defend against the bid and implement strategies to prevent the acquirer from gaining control without fairly compensating shareholders.
Ensuring Transparency and Accountability
Corporate governance in M&A transactions also emphasizes transparency and accountability, ensuring that all parties involved act with integrity. This includes providing shareholders with timely and accurate information about the transaction, such as the rationale for the deal, the terms of the offer, and any potential risks or conflicts of interest.
Transparency is essential in large or complex deals, where the interests of different stakeholders—such as shareholders, management, employees, and regulators—may not always align. Strong governance practices help ensure that the transaction is conducted openly and that any conflicts are disclosed and addressed appropriately.
Regulatory Compliance
Regulatory compliance is a cornerstone of corporate governance in M&A, as companies must adhere to a wide range of legal and regulatory requirements when pursuing a merger or acquisition. These regulations are designed to protect investors, promote fair competition, and ensure that transactions are conducted in a way that does not harm the broader economy.
For example, antitrust laws prevent companies from merging to create a monopoly or reduce competition in a particular market. Securities regulations ensure that shareholders receive accurate information about the deal and that any material information is disclosed to the public. Corporate governance helps ensure that companies meet these regulatory standards, reducing the risk of legal challenges or delays that could derail the transaction.
Common Corporate Governance Challenges in M&A
While strong governance practices are essential to successful M&A transactions, they can also present challenges, particularly when the interests of different parties diverge. Here are some of the most common governance challenges companies face in M&A deals:
Conflicts of Interest
One of the most significant challenges in M&A transactions is managing conflicts of interest, particularly when board members or management stand to benefit personally from the deal. For example, executives may have stock options or other financial incentives that align their interests with the acquirer rather than with the broader shareholder base.
Companies often establish independent board committees to address these conflicts and oversee transactions. These committees consist of directors who are not directly involved in the deal and can provide an objective assessment of the offer. Independent financial and legal advisors may also be brought in to evaluate the terms and ensure that the deal is in the best interest of all shareholders.
Board Composition and Independence
Board composition is another critical aspect of corporate governance in M&A. The board must have the right mix of skills, experience, and independence to evaluate the merits of the transaction and make informed decisions. A lack of independence on the board can lead to poor decision-making, mainly if board members are influenced by management or other stakeholders with a vested interest in the deal.
Shareholders often scrutinize the independence of the board during M&A transactions, and boards that lack sufficient independence may face pushback from activist investors or regulatory bodies. Ensuring that the board has independent directors who can provide an objective perspective is key to maintaining strong governance.
Shareholder Activism
In recent years, shareholder activism has become an increasingly prominent factor in M&A transactions. Activist investors may push for a company to pursue a sale or oppose a proposed deal if they believe it undervalues the company or fails to deliver sufficient returns. Activist shareholders often use their voting power to influence the outcome of M&A deals, and companies must carefully consider their input.
Navigating shareholder activism requires strong governance and communication strategies. Companies must engage with their shareholders, provide clear explanations of the rationale for the transaction, and be prepared to address any concerns or objections that arise. Failing to do so can result in shareholder opposition, proxy battles, or even the scuttling of a deal.
Regulatory Scrutiny
Large M&A transactions are often subject to intense regulatory scrutiny, particularly in industries where consolidation could affect competition or consumer choice. Antitrust regulators, such as the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) or the European Commission, review mergers to ensure that they do not create monopolies or harm the competitive landscape.
Navigating regulatory hurdles requires careful planning and communication with regulators throughout the transaction process. Companies must be prepared to provide detailed information about how the merger will affect the market and address any concerns raised by regulators. Companies may sometimes need to divest certain assets or make concessions to gain regulatory approval.
How Companies Can Strengthen Corporate Governance in M&A
To ensure that M&A transactions are conducted in a way that protects shareholder interests and meets regulatory requirements, companies must prioritize strong corporate governance throughout the process. Here are some best practices for strengthening governance in M&A:
Form Independent Board Committees
One of the most effective ways to ensure objectivity in M&A transactions is to form independent board committees that can evaluate the deal without conflicts of interest. These committees should be composed of directors who are not involved in the company’s management and who can provide a balanced assessment of the transaction.
Engage Independent Advisors
Independent financial and legal advisors are critical in ensuring the transaction is fair to shareholders. These advisors can objectively assess the offer, evaluate potential risks, and help the board negotiate favorable terms.
Enhance Shareholder Communication
Maintaining open and transparent communication with shareholders is essential to securing their support for the deal. Companies should provide detailed information about the rationale for the transaction, the benefits it will bring, and any potential risks. Engaging with shareholders early and addressing their concerns can help avoid shareholder opposition or activism.
Conduct Thorough Due Diligence
Due diligence is essential to identify any potential risks or liabilities associated with the transaction. Both the acquiring company and the target company should conduct comprehensive due diligence to ensure that they fully understand the deal’s financial, operational, and legal implications. This process helps mitigate risks and ensures that the transaction delivers value to shareholders.
Conclusion
Corporate governance is critical to the success of any M&A transaction. By protecting shareholder interests, ensuring transparency and accountability, and complying with regulatory requirements, strong governance helps companies navigate the complexities of mergers and acquisitions.
While M&A transactions can present challenges, such as conflicts of interest, shareholder activism, and regulatory scrutiny, companies that prioritize governance are better positioned to achieve favorable outcomes. By forming independent committees, engaging with shareholders, and conducting thorough due diligence, companies can ensure that their M&A deals maximize value for all stakeholders.
Published by: Josh Tatunay